13 results
53 Healthcare Quality, Race, and Neuropsychological Functioning in Black/African-American Individuals with HIV
- Jasia-Jemay Henderson-Murphy, Karen Alvarez, Maral Aghvinian, Monica Rivera-Mindt, Kathleen Van Dyk, Mariana Cherner, Alyssa Arentoft
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 50-51
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Rates of HIV are disproportionately high among Black individuals in the United States (CDC, 2020). Black individuals are at increased risk for neurocognitive impairment due to HIV (Marquine et al., 2016) and experience health disparities including increased morbidity and mortality (Asari, 2018; Manly et al., 1998). We sought to examine the relationship between perceived quality of healthcare and neuropsychological functioning among people living with HIV (PLWH) who identify as Black compared to those who are non-Black.
Participants and Methods:151 PLWH in the Los Angeles area (52% Black, age = 49.85 ± 10.54, education = 13.23 ± 2.11; 87% cisgender men, 8% cisgender women, 1% transgender men, 3% transgender women) completed comprehensive neuropsychological (NP) assessments (from which demographically-corrected domain and global T-scores were derived), psychiatric and sociodemographic interviews, and self-report questionnaires, including a measure of perceived healthcare quality (i.e., QUOTE-HIV). Statistical analyses included chi-square, t-test, ANOVA, and stepwise linear regression.
Results:Only 14% of Black PLWH had private healthcare insurance (versus Medicare/Medicaid) compared to 33% of nonBlack PLWH (x2=11.33, p<.01). Black participants were significantly older than nonBlack participants (p<.01), but did not differ on gender, education, income, CD4 count, or HIV viral load. Younger Black participants (based on a median split for age; n = 23) reported the lowest perceived quality of healthcare (i.e., QUOTE-HIV total performance score), while older Black participants (n = 56) reported the highest perceived care (F = 3.80, p = .01), but the same relationship was not observed in nonBlack participants. In a stepwise multivariate regression model, including demographic and virological factors as well as healthcare quality, only household income and overall perceived healthcare quality (i.e., QUOTE-HIV total performance score) were significantly associated with Global NP T-scores among Black PLWH (R2=.12, F(1, 66)=4.46, p=.02).
Conclusions:When assessing healthcare quality and healthcare experiences among people living with HIV, race and age are important to consider. Private healthcare coverage may be less accessible to people of color, and in a multivariate model, only income and healthcare quality significantly predicted neuropsychological functioning in Black PLWH. When examining HIV and health outcomes, the complex relationships among quality of healthcare and health disparities, neuropsychological functioning, and structural racism warrant further investigation.
5 The Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation with Neurocognition in a Diverse Cohort of Middle- and Older-Aged Persons Living with and Without HIV
- Lily Kamalyan, Marta Jankowska, Anya Umlauf, Martha E Perez, Alonzo Mendoza, Lina Scandalis, Donald R Franklin, Matthew Allison, Igor Grant, Mariana Cherner, Maria J Marquine
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 685-687
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Due to decades of structural and institutional racism, minoritized individuals in the US are more likely to live in low socioeconomic neighborhoods, which may underlie the observed greater risk for neurocognitive impairment as they age. However, these relationships have not been examined among people aging with HIV. To investigate neurocognitive disparities among middle- and older-aged Latino and non-Latino White people living with HIV (PWH), and whether neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation may partially mediate these relationships.
Participants and Methods:Participants were 372 adults ages 40-85 living in southern California, including 186 Latinos (94 PWH, 92 without HIV) and 186 non-Latino (NL) Whites (94 PWH, 92 without HIV) age-matched to the Latino group (for the overall cohort: Age M=57.0, SD=9.1, Education: M=12.7, SD=3.9, 38% female; for the group of PWH: 66% AIDS, 88% on antiretroviral therapy [ART]; 98% undetectable plasma RNA [among those on ART]). Participants completed psychiatric and neuromedical evaluations and neuropsychological tests of verbal fluency, learning and memory in person or remotely. Neuropsychological results were converted to demographically-unadjusted global scaled scores for our primary outcome. A neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation variable (SESDep) was generated for census tracts in San Diego County using American Community Survey 2013-2017 data. Principal components analysis was used to create one measure using nine variables comprising educational (% with high school diploma), occupational (% unemployed), economic (rent to income ratio, % in poverty, (% female-headed households with dependent children, % with no car, % on public assistance), and housing (% rented housing, % crowded rooms) factors. Census tract SESDep values were averaged for a 1km radius buffer around participants’ home addresses.
Results:Univariable analyses (independent samples t-tests and Chi-square tests) indicated Latinos were more likely to be female and had fewer years of formal education than NL-Whites (ps<.05). Latino PWH had higher nadir CD4 than White PWH (p=.02). Separate multivariable regression models in the overall sample, controlling for demographics and HIV status, showed Latinos had significantly lower global scaled scores than Whites (b=-0.59; 95%CI-1.13, -0.06; p=.03) and lived in more deprived neighborhoods (b=0.62; 95%CI=0.36, 0.88; p<.001). More SES deprivation was significant associated with worse global neurocognition in an unadjusted linear regression (b=-0.55; 95%CI=-0.82, -0.28; p<.001), but similar analyses controlling for demographics and HIV status, showed SESDep was not significantly related to global scaled scores (b=-0.11; 95%CI= -0.36, 0.14; p=.40). Exploratory analyses examined primary language (i.e., English vs Spanish) as a marker of Hispanic heterogeneity and its association with neurocognition and SESDep. Controlling for demographics and HIV status, both English-speaking (b=0.33; 95%CI=0.01. 0.64; p=.04) and Spanish-speaking Latinos (b=0.88; 95%CI=0.58, 1.18; p<.001) lived in significantly greater SESDep neighborhoods than Whites, with SESDep greater for Spanish-speakers than English-speakers (p<.001). However, only English-speaking Latinos had significantly lower neurocognition than Whites (b=-0.91; 95%CI=0-1.57, -0.26; p<.01; Spanish-speakers: b=-0.27; 95%CI=-0.93, 0.38; p=.41).
Conclusions:Among our sample of diverse older adults living with and without HIV, English-speaking Latinos showed worse neurocognition than Whites. Though SES neighborhood deprivation was worse among Latinos (particularly Spanish-speakers) it was not associated with neurocognitive scores after adjusting for demographics. Further studies investigating other neighborhood characteristics and more nuanced markers of Hispanic heterogeneity (e.g., acculturation) are warranted to understand factors underlying aging and HIV-related neurocognitive disparities among diverse older adults.
4 Methamphetamine, cannabis, HIV, and their combined effects on neurocognition
- Jeffrey M Rogers, Igor Grant, Maria Cecilia Marcondes, Erin E Morgan, Mariana Cherner, Ronald J Ellis, Scott L Letendre, Robert K Heaton, Jennifer E Iudicello
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 797-798
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Methamphetamine and cannabis are two widely used substances with possibly opposing effects on aspects of central nervous system functioning. Use of these substances is prevalent among people with HIV (PWH), though their combined effects on HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment (NCI) are unknown. Adverse effects of methamphetamine use on cognition are well documented. Cannabis may disturb cognition acutely, though its longer-term effects in PWH are not well understood. Our prior analysis of people without HIV (PWoH) found that cotemporaneous cannabis use was associated with better neurocognitive outcomes among methamphetamine users. The aim of this study was to assess how lifetime cannabis and methamphetamine use disorder relate to neurocognitive outcomes in PWH.
Participants and Methods:HIV-positive participants (n=472) were on average 45.6±11.5 years of age, male (86.4%), White (60.6%), and educated 13.9±2.5 years. Most participants were on ART (81.9%) and virally suppressed (70%). Participants were stratified by lifetime methamphetamine (M-/M+) and cannabis (C-/C+) DSM-IV abuse/dependence disorder into four groups: M-C- (n=187), M-C+ (n=68), M+C-, (n=82) and M+C+ (n=135) and completed a comprehensive neurobehavioral assessment. Demographically corrected T-scores and deficit scores were used for analyses. Group differences in global and domain NC performances (i.e., T-scores) were examined using multiple linear regression, holding constant covariates that were associated with study groups and/or cognition. Specifically, M+ participants displayed higher rates of Hepatitis C infection (p=.004), higher current depressive symptom scores (p<.001), and higher rates of detectable plasma HIV RNA (p=.014). Multiple logistic regression was used to test for group differences in probability of neurocognitive impairment (i.e., deficit scores>0.5), including the same covariates. Pooling data with a sample of HIV-negative participants (n=423), we used generalized linear mixed effect models to examine how neurocognitive performance and impairment profiles varied by methamphetamine and/or cannabis use group, HIV disease characteristics, and their interactions.
Results:Compared to M+C+, M+C- performed worse on measures of executive functions (ß=-3.17), learning (ß=-3.95), memory (ß=-5.58), and working memory (ß=-4.05) and were more likely to be classified as impaired in the learning (OR=2.93), memory (OR=5.24), and working memory (OR=2.48) domains. M-C- performed better than M+C+ on measures of learning (ß=3.46) and memory (ß=5.19), but worse than M-C+ on measures of executive functions (ß=-3.90), learning (ß=-3.32), memory (ß=-3.38), and working memory (ß=-3.38). Generalized linear mixed effect models indicate that detectable plasma HIV RNA (ß=-1.85) and low nadir CD4 T-cell counts (nadir CD4<200; ß=-1.07) were associated with worse neurocognitive performance, and these effects did not differ in size or direction by substance use group.
Conclusions:In PWH, lifetime methamphetamine use disorder and both current and legacy markers of HIV disease severity are associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes. Cannabis use disorder does not appear to exacerbate methamphetamine-related deficits in PWH. Instead, results are consistent with findings from preclinical studies that cannabis use may protect against methamphetamine’s deleterious effects. Profile analysis models showed that participants with a history of cannabis use disorder display better overall neurocognitive performance than comparison (M-C-) participants. Mechanisms underlying a potential protective effect of cannabis may be elucidated by examining the temporal relationship between cannabis and methamphetamine consumption and neurocognitive performance.
4 Norm Selection and Application in Socially Responsible Neuropsychological Practice
- Daniel Saldana, Lucia Cavanagh, Paola Suarez, Mariana Cherner
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, p. 872
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
In the wake of the national controversy over demographically corrected normative comparisons used in neuropsychological assessment, the field finds itself in need of adopting better practices and providing stronger instruction in norm selection and application when assessing underrepresented populations. Neuropsychologists must employ critical thinking within their clinical decision-making that takes into account patient demographics, analysis of the measures themselves, normative samples, and statistical adjustments employed in normative studies. Not doing so may result in erroneous diagnostic conclusions, exposing underserved patient populations to poor or harmful clinical care and even misdiagnosis. The following case series presents several demographic considerations illustrating how selection and application of different (at times, ill-fitting) normative reference groups can affect treatment outcomes in the Latinx community. We examined the performance of various published norms when applied to monolingual and bilingual Spanish speakers.
Participants and Methods:This study samples three demographically diverse (i.e., education, age, and sex) clinical cases and applies regression-based and stratified norms to raw scores to demonstrate the possible differential outcomes when using different reference groups. One example is Ms. Congeniality, a 69-year-old, Spanish and English bilingual woman with 12 years of education who presented for a third revaluation at our clinic due to progressive memory loss. Her prior Spanish language profiles demonstrated impaired confrontation naming and steadily decreasing letter fluency over the past 10 years.
Results:Her performance on semantic fluency (i.e., animal naming) showed relative stability based on her raw scores (10 in 2012, 11 in 2016, and 12 in 2022). Using the Neuropsi A&M norms, which stratify performance across nine age ranges between ages 6-85 and three education ranges between 0-10+ years, her performance over the past 10 years ranged between the less than 1st percentile to the 9th percentile (1%, 1%, and 9%, respectively). However, using the NP-NUMBRS norms, which use regression-based continuous age (19-60) and education (0-20) predictors of test performance, her scores corresponded to steadily improved performance (8%, 28%, and 86%). Thus, this qualitative comparison demonstrates a likely overcorrection for individuals of advanced age when using norms based on samples that are a poor fit because they lack representation of older adults, as in NP-NUMBRS, and a possible undercorrection when using norms with overly broad education stratifications (e.g., 10-22 years, as in Neuropsi).
Conclusions:Application of ill-fitting normative standards can have far-reaching implications for interpretation of neuropsychological test results. Moreover, this case series exemplifies the need for higher-order instruction in norm selection, specifically for underserved communities who run the risk of being misdiagnosed. Through case examples, this study underscores the importance of understanding the unique effects of different demographic corrections in the context of limited available normative reference groups. This abstract is the first illustration in a series of papers aimed at facilitating the decision-making process within the framework of socially responsible neuropsychological practice.
Cannabis use may attenuate neurocognitive performance deficits resulting from methamphetamine use disorder
- Jeffrey M. Rogers, Igor Grant, Maria Cecilia G. Marcondes, Erin E. Morgan, Mariana Cherner, Ronald J. Ellis, Scott L. Letendre, Robert K. Heaton, Jennifer E. Iudicello
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 30 / Issue 1 / January 2024
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 09 August 2023, pp. 84-93
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Methamphetamine and cannabis are two widely used, and frequently co-used, substances with possibly opposing effects on the central nervous system. Evidence of neurocognitive deficits related to use is robust for methamphetamine and mixed for cannabis. Findings regarding their combined use are inconclusive. We aimed to compare neurocognitive performance in people with lifetime cannabis or methamphetamine use disorder diagnoses, or both, relative to people without substance use disorders.
Method:423 (71.9% male, aged 44.6 ± 14.2 years) participants, stratified by presence or absence of lifetime methamphetamine (M−/M+) and/or cannabis (C−/C+) DSM-IV abuse/dependence, completed a comprehensive neuropsychological, substance use, and psychiatric assessment. Neurocognitive domain T-scores and impairment rates were examined using multiple linear and binomial regression, respectively, controlling for covariates that may impact cognition.
Results:Globally, M+C+ performed worse than M−C− but better than M+C−. M+C+ outperformed M+C− on measures of verbal fluency, information processing speed, learning, memory, and working memory. M−C+ did not display lower performance than M−C− globally or on any domain measures, and M−C+ even performed better than M−C− on measures of learning, memory, and working memory.
Conclusions:Our findings are consistent with prior work showing that methamphetamine use confers risk for worse neurocognitive outcomes, and that cannabis use does not appear to exacerbate and may even reduce this risk. People with a history of cannabis use disorders performed similarly to our nonsubstance using comparison group and outperformed them in some domains. These findings warrant further investigation as to whether cannabis use may ameliorate methamphetamine neurotoxicity.
Emotional health and its association with neurocognition in Hispanic and non-Hispanic White people with HIV
- Lesley A. Guareña, Lily Kamalyan, Caitlin Wei-Ming Watson, Kayle Karcher, Anya Umlauf, Erin Morgan, David Moore, Ronald Ellis, Igor Grant, Mariana Cherner, Raeanne C. Moore, Zvinka Z. Zlatar, Robert K. Heaton, María J. Marquine
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 30 / Issue 1 / January 2024
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 20 April 2023, pp. 56-66
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Emotional functioning is linked to HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment, yet research on this association among diverse people with HIV (PWH) is scant. We examined emotional health and its association with neurocognition in Hispanic and White PWH.
Methods:Participants included 107 Hispanic (41% primarily Spanish-speakers; 80% Mexican heritage/origin) and 216 White PWH (Overall age: M = 53.62, SD = 12.19; 86% male; 63% AIDS; 92% on antiretroviral therapy). Emotional health was assessed via the National Institute of Health Toolbox (NIHTB)-Emotion Battery, which yields T-scores for three factor-based summary scores (negative affect, social satisfaction, and psychological well-being) and 13 individual component scales. Neurocognition was measured via demographically adjusted fluid cognition T-scores from the NIHTB-cognition battery.
Results:27%–39% of the sample had problematic socioemotional summary scores. Hispanic PWH showed less loneliness, better social satisfaction, higher meaning and purpose, and better psychological well-being than Whites (ps <.05). Within Hispanics, Spanish-speakers showed better meaning and purpose, higher psychological well-being summary score, less anger hostility, but greater fear affect than English speakers. Only in Whites, worse negative affect (fear affect, perceived stress, and sadness) was associated with worse neurocognition (p <.05); and in both groups, worse social satisfaction (emotional support, friendship, and perceived rejection) was linked with worse neurocognition (p <.05).
Conclusion:Adverse emotional health is common among PWH, with subgroups of Hispanics showing relative strengths in some domains. Aspects of emotional health differentially relate to neurocogntition among PWH and cross-culturally. Understanding these varying associations is an important step towards the development of culturally relevant interventions that promote neurocognitive health among Hispanic PWH.
Influence of Educational Background, Childhood Socioeconomic Environment, and Language Use on Cognition among Spanish-Speaking Latinos Living Near the US–Mexico Border
- Lily Kamalyan, Lesley A. Guareña, Mirella Díaz-Santos, Paola Suarez, Mariana Cherner, Marlen Y. García Alcorn, Anya Umlauf, Donald R. Franklin, Monica Rivera Mindt, Lidia Artiola i Fortuny, Robert K. Heaton, María J. Marquine
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 28 / Issue 8 / September 2022
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 06 September 2021, pp. 876-890
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives:
We investigated the impact of culturally relevant social, educational, and language factors on cognitive test performance among Spanish speakers living near the US–Mexico border.
Methods:Participants included 254 healthy native Spanish speakers from the Neuropsychological Norms for the US–Mexico Border Region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS) project (Age: M = 37.3, SD = 10.4; Education: M = 10.7, SD = 4.3; 59% Female). A comprehensive neuropsychological battery was administered in Spanish. Individual test scaled scores and T-scores (based on region-specific norms adjusted for age, education, and sex) were averaged to create Global Mean Scaled and T-scores. Measures of culturally relevant factors included a self-reported indicator of educational quality/access (proportion of education in Spanish-speaking country, quality of school/classroom setting, stopped attending school to work), childhood socioeconomic environment (parental education, proportion of time living in Spanish-speaking country, childhood socioeconomic and health status, access to basic resources, work as a child), and Spanish/English language use and fluency.
Results:Several culturally relevant variables were significantly associated with unadjusted Global Scaled Scores in univariable analyses. When using demographically adjusted T-scores, fewer culturally relevant characteristics were significant. In multivariable analyses, being bilingual (p = .04) and working as a child for one’s own benefit compared to not working as a child (p = .006) were significantly associated with higher Global Mean T-score, accounting for 9% of variance.
Conclusions:Demographically adjusted normative data provide a useful tool for the identification of brain dysfunction, as these account for much of the variance of sociocultural factors on cognitive test performance. Yet, certain culturally relevant variables still contributed to cognitive test performance above and beyond basic demographics, warranting further investigation.
Conditional Effects of Lifetime Alcohol Consumption on Methamphetamine-Associated Neurocognitive Performance
- Rowan Saloner, Emily W. Paolillo, Anya Umlauf, David J. Moore, Robert K. Heaton, Igor Grant, Mariana Cherner, The TMARC Group
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 25 / Issue 8 / September 2019
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 June 2019, pp. 787-799
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Objectives:
Methamphetamine (MA) dependence contributes to neurotoxicity and neurocognitive deficits. Although combined alcohol and MA misuse is common, how alcohol consumption relates to neurocognitive performance among MA users remains unclear. We hypothesized that alcohol and MA use would synergistically diminish neurocognitive functioning, such that greater reported alcohol consumption would exert larger negative effects on neurocognition among MA-dependent individuals compared to MA-nonusing persons.
Methods:Eighty-seven MA-dependent (MA+) and 114 MA-nonusing (MA−) adults underwent neuropsychological and substance use assessments. Linear and logistic regressions examined the interaction between MA status and lifetime average drinks per drinking day on demographically corrected global neurocognitive T scores and impairment rates, controlling for recent alcohol use, lifetime cannabis use, WRAT reading performance, and lifetime depression.
Results:MA+ displayed moderately higher rates of impairment and lower T scores compared to MA−. Lifetime alcohol use significantly interacted with MA status to predict global impairment (ORR = 0.70, p = .003) such that greater lifetime alcohol use increased likelihood of impairment in MA−, but decreased likelihood of impairment in MA+. Greater lifetime alcohol use predicted poorer global T scores among MA− (b = −0.44, p = .030) but not MA+ (b = 0.08, p = .586).
Conclusions:Contrary to expectations, greater lifetime alcohol use related to reduced risk of neurocognitive impairment among MA users. Findings are supported by prior research identifying neurobiological mechanisms by which alcohol may attenuate stimulant-driven vasoconstriction and brain thermotoxicity. Replication and examination of neurophysiologic mechanisms underlying alcohol use in the context of MA dependence are warranted to elucidate whether alcohol confers a degree of neuroprotection.
Differences in Neurocognitive Impairment Among HIV-Infected Latinos in the United States
- María J. Marquine, Anne Heaton, Neco Johnson, Monica Rivera-Mindt, Mariana Cherner, Cinnamon Bloss, Todd Hulgan, Anya Umlauf, David J. Moore, Pariya Fazeli, Susan Morgello, Donald Franklin, Jr., Scott Letendre, Ron Ellis, Ann C. Collier, Christina M. Marra, David. B. Clifford, Benjamin B. Gelman, Ned Sacktor, David Simpson, J. Allen McCutchan, Igor Grant, Robert K. Heaton
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 24 / Issue 2 / February 2018
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 06 September 2017, pp. 163-175
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Objectives: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disproportionately affects Hispanics/Latinos in the United States, yet little is known about neurocognitive impairment (NCI) in this group. We compared the rates of NCI in large well-characterized samples of HIV-infected (HIV+) Latinos and (non-Latino) Whites, and examined HIV-associated NCI among subgroups of Latinos. Methods: Participants included English-speaking HIV+ adults assessed at six U.S. medical centers (194 Latinos, 600 Whites). For overall group, age: M=42.65 years, SD=8.93; 86% male; education: M=13.17, SD=2.73; 54% had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. NCI was assessed with a comprehensive test battery with normative corrections for age, education and gender. Covariates examined included HIV-disease characteristics, comorbidities, and genetic ancestry. Results: Compared with Whites, Latinos had higher rates of global NCI (42% vs. 54%), and domain NCI in executive function, learning, recall, working memory, and processing speed. Latinos also fared worse than Whites on current and historical HIV-disease characteristics, and nadir CD4 partially mediated ethnic differences in NCI. Yet, Latinos continued to have more global NCI [odds ratio (OR)=1.59; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.13–2.23; p<.01] after adjusting for significant covariates. Higher rates of global NCI were observed with Puerto Rican (n=60; 71%) versus Mexican (n=79, 44%) origin/descent; this disparity persisted in models adjusting for significant covariates (OR=2.40; CI=1.11–5.29; p=.03). Conclusions: HIV+ Latinos, especially of Puerto Rican (vs. Mexican) origin/descent had increased rates of NCI compared with Whites. Differences in rates of NCI were not completely explained by worse HIV-disease characteristics, neurocognitive comorbidities, or genetic ancestry. Future studies should explore culturally relevant psychosocial, biomedical, and genetic factors that might explain these disparities and inform the development of targeted interventions. (JINS, 2018, 24, 163–175)
Second-Language Fluency Predicts Native Language Stroop Effects: Evidence from Spanish–English Bilinguals
- Paola A. Suarez, Tamar H. Gollan, Robert Heaton, Igor Grant, Mariana Cherner, the HNRC Group
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 20 / Issue 3 / March 2014
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 12 March 2014, pp. 342-348
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Studies have shown reduced Stroop interference in bilinguals compared to monolinguals defined dichotomously, but no study has explored how varying degrees of second language fluency, might affect linguistic inhibitory control in the first language. We examined effects of relative English fluency on the ability to inhibit the automatic reading response on the Golden version of the Stroop Test administered in Spanish. Participants were 141 (49% male) adult native Spanish speakers from the U.S.–Mexico border region (education range = 8–20 and age range = 20–63). A language dominance index was calculated as the ratio of English words to total words produced in both languages using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test with letters PMR in Spanish and FAS in English. Greater degree of English fluency as measured by the dominance index predicted better speed on the Stroop incongruent trial independent of education effects. On the other hand, neither the dominance index nor education predicted performance on the word reading and color-naming trials. These results suggest an advantage in inhibitory control among those with greater second-language ability. (JINS, 2014, 20, 342–348)
Preliminary evidence of motor impairment among polysubstance 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine users with intact neuropsychological functioning
- CHAD A. BOUSMAN, MARIANA CHERNER, KRISTEN T. EMORY, DANIEL BARRON, PATRICIA GREBENSTEIN, J. HAMPTON ATKINSON, ROBERT K. HEATON, IGOR GRANT, THE HNRC GROUP
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 16 / Issue 6 / November 2010
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 25 August 2010, pp. 1047-1055
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Neuropsychological disturbances have been reported in association with use of the recreational drug “ecstasy,” or 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), but findings have been inconsistent. We performed comprehensive neuropsychological testing examining seven ability domains in 21 MDMA users (MDMA+) and 21 matched control participants (MDMA−). Among MDMA+ participants, median [interquartile range] lifetime MDMA use was 186 [111, 516] doses, with 120 [35–365] days of abstinence. There were no significant group differences in neuropsychological performance, with the exception of the motor speed/dexterity domain in which 43% of MDMA+ were impaired compared with 5% of MDMA− participants (p = .004). Motor impairment differences were not explained by use of other substances and were unrelated to length of abstinence or lifetime number of MDMA doses. Findings provide limited evidence for neuropsychological differences between MDMA+ and MDMA− participants with the exception of motor impairments observed in the MDMA+ group. However, replication of this finding in a larger sample is warranted. (JINS, 2010, 16, 1047–1055.)
Cytochrome P450-2D6 extensive metabolizers are more vulnerable to methamphetamine-associated neurocognitive impairment: Preliminary findings
- MARIANA CHERNER, CHAD BOUSMAN, IAN EVERALL, DANIEL BARRON, SCOTT LETENDRE, FLORIN VAIDA, J. HAMPTON ATKINSON, ROBERT HEATON, IGOR GRANT, THE HNRC GROUP
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 16 / Issue 5 / September 2010
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 23 August 2010, pp. 890-901
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
While neuropsychological deficits are evident among methamphetamine (meth) addicts, they are often unrelated to meth exposure parameters such as lifetime consumption and length of abstinence. The notion that some meth users develop neuropsychological impairments while others with similar drug exposure do not, suggests that there may be individual differences in vulnerability to the neurotoxic effects of meth. One source of differential vulnerability could come from genotypic variability in metabolic clearance of meth, dependent on the activity of cytochrome P450-2D6 (CYP2D6). We compared neuropsychological performance in 52 individuals with a history of meth dependence according with their CYP2D6 phenotype. All were free of HIV or hepatitis C infection and did not meet dependence criteria for other substances. Extensive metabolizers showed worse overall neuropsychological performance and were three times as likely to be cognitively impaired as intermediate/poor metabolizers. Groups did not differ in their demographic or meth use characteristics, nor did they evidence differences in mood disorder or other substance use. This preliminary study is the first to suggest that efficient meth metabolism is associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes in humans, and implicates the products of oxidative metabolism of meth as a possible source of brain injury. (JINS, 2010, 16, 890–901.)
Computerized reaction time battery versus a traditional neuropsychological battery: Detecting HIV-related impairments
- Gonzalez Raul, Heaton Robert K., Moore David J., Letendre Scott, Ellis Ronald J., Wolfson Tanya, Marcotte Thomas, Cherner Mariana, Rippeth Julie, Grant Igor, The Hnrc Group
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 9 / Issue 1 / January 2003
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 13 January 2003, pp. 64-71
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
In recent years, interest in the use of computerized neuropsychological (NP) assessment measures has increased. However, there are limited data regarding how performance on these measures relates to performance on more traditional, clinical instruments. In the present study, 82 HIV+ men, who were all believed on clinical grounds to have neurobehavioral impairment, completed a traditional NP battery (TNB) and the California Computerized Assessment Package (CalCAP, a collection of computerized reaction time tests). Summary scores based on a TNB, as well as those based on the CalCAP, demonstrated significant associations with both degree of immunosuppression (CD4 count) and detectable viral load in cerebrospinal fluid, but not with detectable viral load in plasma. Established norms on the TNB and CalCAP batteries resulted in classifying 57% and 49% of the HIV+ sample as impaired, respectively. When using the TNB as the “gold standard,” impairment classifications based on CalCAP summary scores exhibited a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 77%. Overall agreement on impairment classifications between batteries was low (kappa = .44). Data from this study suggest that traditional NP batteries and computerized reaction time tests do not measure the same thing, and are not interchangeable in examining HIV-related NP impairments. (JINS, 2003, 9, 64–71.)